Settlement of Litigation and Non-Litigation Disputes in Sharia Economic Cases: A Case Study of The Musyarakah Contract

Authors

  • Aulia Nurhikmah UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Farid Madani Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasional Bandung
  • Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Keywords:

Litigation, Non-Litigation, Mediation, Contract of Musyarakah, KHES

Abstract

Disputes can be resolved through litigation (in court) or non-litigation (out of court). Dispute resolution through litigation involves examining disputes before a judge in court. Whether it's public or private disputes, litigation, or court, are the most common dispute resolution methods. As time goes by, people's needs for justice and welfare increase. As a result, dispute resolution through litigation has become less effective. This is considered too long and costs quite a lot. In situations like this, people who seek justice begin to look for other options, namely dispute resolution outside the judicial process, which is called dispute resolution that does not involve litigation, i.e. non-litigation is carried out and the role of mediators. In the aspect of settlement using non-litigation methods for a quick and cheap settlement through the role of mediators in non-litigation dispute resolution through the negotiation stages, mediation, conciliation, and arbitration are some of the methods of resolving disputes outside of court. The discussion of the Musyarakah Contract  is a form of financing that is commonly used in Islamic financial institutions. This research uses a normative approach to research to reveal the truth systematically, methodologically, and consistently. This approach has been collected and processed, analyzed and used for constructive purposes during the research process, how effective the role of mediators is in non-litigation dispute resolution

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Djazuli.(2002) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Islam: Majalah Al-Ahkam Al-Adliyah (Cet. I; Bandung: KIBLAT PRESS), Hal 449.

Achmad Ali.(1999) Pengadilan dan Masyarakat (Ujung Pandang: Hasanuddin University Press), Hal. 17.

Gatot Soemartono.(2006) Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia (Cet. I; Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama), Hal. 2.

Gunawan Wijaya dan Achmad Yani.(2000) Hukum Arbitrase (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada), Hal. 32.

Harahap, Yahya. (1997). Beberapa tinjauan mengenai system peradilan dan penyelesaian sengketa. (Bandung :PT. Citra Aditya Bakti), Hal. 280

Ida Bagus Wyasa Putra. (2000) Aspek-aspek Hukum Perdata Internasional dalam Transaksi Bisnis Internasional (Cet. I; Bandung: Refika Aditama), Hal. 77.

Iman Sudiyati.(1999) Asas-asas Hukum Adat (Yogyakarta: Liberty), Hal. 33.

Ka'bah, Rifyal. (2006). Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Buletin Dahwah DDII: DKI Jakarta. Hal. 12

Priyatna Abdurrasyid.(2002) Arbitrase & Alternative Penyelesaian Sengketa: Suatu Pengantar (Jakarta: Fikahati Aneka), Hal. 155.

Republik Indonesia, “PP Nomor 72 Tahun 2005 tentang “Desa” dalam Himpunan Peraturan Perundang-undangan tentang Pemerintahan Desa dan Kelurahan (Cet. I; Bandung: Fokusmedia, 2006), Hal. 11.

Republik Indonesia, “UU Noor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa” dalam Gatot Soemartono, Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia (Cet. I; Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2006), Hal. 164.

Nasution, Mustafa Edwin. (2006). Pengenalan Eklusif; Ekonomi Islam. Kencana: Jakarta. Hal 38

Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas.(2025). Legal System dan Implementasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah pada LKS, (Bandung: Widana Media Utama), Hal 59.

Roedjiono. (1996). Alternative Dispute Resolution (Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa), UII Press, Jakarta. Hal 5

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (Cet. I; Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1993), h Hal 177-182.

Usman, Rachmadi. (2003). Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa diluar Pengadilan. PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung. Hal 110

Widiana, Wahyu dan Kamaluddin (2007), Ekonomi Syariah dalam Perspektif UU No. 3 tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 7 tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama. Dirjen Badilag, Jakarta. Hal. 4

Abdurrahman.(2008). Kewenangan Peradilan Agama di bidang Ekonomi Syariah; Tantangan Masa yang akan datang, dalam Suara Uldilag Vol 3 No. XII. Pokja Perdata Agama MA RI, Jakarta. Hal. 67

Hoirul Ichfan, Umrotul Hasanah. (2021). Aplikasi Pembiayaan Akad Musyarakah pada perbankan syari’ah Muhasabatuna: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Islam Vol 2 Issue 1. Lumajang Hal 2.

Ina Nur Inayah, “PRINSIP-PRINSIP EKONOMI ISLAM DALAM INVESTASI SYARIAH,” AKSY: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Syariah 2, no. 2 (2020), https://doi.org/10.15575/aksy.v2i2.9801.

Lubis, Nur A. Fadil, Prof Dr, MA.Ph.D. (2008). Peluang dan Tantangan peradilan Agama dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Ekonomi syariah Pasca Lahirnya Undang-Undang No. 3 Tahun 2006, dalam Suara Uldilag Vol 3 No. XII. Pokja Perdata Agama MA RI, Jakarta, Hal. 14

Pramudya, K. (2018). Strategi Pengembangan Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Penguatan Fungsi Pengadilan Agama Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 7(1), Hal. 35-47

Rita Yuliana, “MUHASABAH BANK SYARIAH DALAM PENERAPAN PRINSIP BAGI HASIL,” IMANENSI: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi Islam 1, no. 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.34202/imanensi.1.1.2013.51-61.

Suadi, H. A., & SH, M. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Praktik Ed Revisi (Vol. 1). Kencana. Hal. 1.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

How to Cite

Nurhikmah, A., Madani, F., & Sunaryo Mukhlas, O. (2025). Settlement of Litigation and Non-Litigation Disputes in Sharia Economic Cases: A Case Study of The Musyarakah Contract. Zona Law And Public Administration Indonesia, 3(4), 1–20. Retrieved from https://ejournal.zona-edu.org/index.php/ZLPAI/article/view/153

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)